National Company Law Tribunal

India’s Company Law Tribunals at a Crossroads: Jurisdictional Overlaps, Forum Shopping and the Way Forward

The establishment of the National Company Law Tribunal (“NCLT”) and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (“NCLAT”) represented a pivotal moment in India’s corporate litigation landscape. These statutory tribunals were conceived as part of a broader project to modernise the adjudication of corporate disputes in India by relevant domain experts. However, nearly a decade after their operationalisation, the functioning of the NCLT and NCLAT has exposed a growing tension. The statutory architecture of the NCLT and NCLAT rests on exclusive jurisdiction-conferring clauses such as Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 (the “Companies Act”), and Section 60 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (the “IBC”). These provisions expressly bar the jurisdiction of civil courts in matters where these tribunals are empowered to adjudicate. Appellate mechanisms under both the above statutes envisage a streamlined appeal mechanism from the NCLT to the NCLAT, and ultimately to the Supreme Court of India.
While in theory, this framework appears robust, in practice, however, these tribunals have become increasingly enmeshed in jurisdictional conflicts with civil courts, arbitral tribunals, sectoral regulators, and specialised adjudicatory bodies. As a result, the corporate litigation regime in India is characterised by procedural inconsistency, overlapping authority, leading to the tactical use of forum shopping by litigants.
In this note, we investigate these conflicts through a focused examination of four key domains that fall within the remit of the NCLT and the NCLAT: (i) corporate insolvency; (ii) corporate restructuring; (iii) shareholder governance and remedies; and (iv) auditor fraud and misconduct. The ambiguities in these areas have enabled litigants to exploit institutional gaps, undermining efficiency, delaying resolution and producing conflicting outcomes. To address these concerns, we propose certain legislative and procedural reforms aimed at restoring the exclusivity and institutional integrity that the framework was originally designed to achieve.


Indian maritime laws

Charting a New Course: An Overhaul of India’s Maritime Legislation

India’s maritime sector has expanded substantially over the past 10 years. To improve upon the growth spurt, the Government has recently adopted five new legislations with the aim to modernize regulations, boost investment and streamline port operations. This note seeks to highlight certain key provisions introduced in these pivotal legislations and recent policy.


AI framework in the Indian financial sector

A Framework for Using AI in the Indian Financial Sector

On August 13, 2025, a committee constituted by the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) released its report with respect to a proposed framework for the responsible and ethical enablement (FREE) of artificial intelligence (AI) models in the Indian financial sector (such report, “FREE AI Report”), pursuant to principles of transparency, responsibility, and ethical deployment. The proposed framework may require RBI-regulated entities, including banks, to undertake significant investments and operational changes, including with respect to new governance structures and capacity-building measures.
In general, the FREE AI Report provides an overview of potential compliance obligations which might be imposed on RBI-regulated entities through future AI-related regulation. In that regard, the report proposes a sector-specific approach based on amendments to existing regulations and new AI-specific rules. Accordingly, a principles-based framework has been recommended for developing new regulations to guide the development, deployment, and governance of AI. The report also recommends including AI regulation within the scope of certain existing RBI master directions, including on cybersecurity, digital lending, customer service, fraud detection, information technology (“IT”) governance, and outsourcing of IT services.
This note provides a broad overview of the FREE AI Report and discusses the ways in which RBI-regulated entities could act upon its recommendations, including for the purpose of preparing for future AI regulation. AI governance requirements may involve the design and implementation of measures and strategies to ensure that AI models deployed in the financial sector are safe, reliable, and trustworthy, including for enhancing customer confidence and trust, and facilitating greater integration of AI models in finance.
 


sale deed

The Silent Risk in Sale Deed Structuring: Stamp Duty, Under-Valuation Allegations and the Rise of Tax Probes in Land Deals

The process of purchasing property in India is intricate and involves multiple stages, from identifying the property to the signing and registration of a sale deed. While it may appear that once you complete the steps of due diligence, obtain necessary sale permissions, finalize documentation and register the sale deed, the process is complete, real estate transactions may still carry risks that surface later.
This note sheds light on such risks involving stamp duty implications, allegations of under-valuation and covers points to be kept in consideration when structuring sale deeds.


Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025

The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (“Bill”) proposes the single biggest overhaul to the existing insolvency framework in India since the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (“Code”) came into effect in December 2016. The Bill attempts to address various challenges that have arisen with the Code’s implementation and to clarify ambiguities and unintended consequences that have resulted from certain judicial decisions. These changes include amendments to streamline the corporate insolvency resolution process, changes to provide for supervision of the liquidation process by the committee of creditors, clarifications on treatment of security interests in liquidation and changes to the framework for preferential, undervalued, fraudulent, and extortionate credit transactions. In addition, the Bill introduces new concepts such as the creditor-initiated insolvency resolution process, which provides an alternative process to the corporate insolvency resolution process under the Code and enabling provisions for the Government to frame rules on group insolvency and cross border insolvency. These proposed amendments collectively aim to restore the Code’s core principles of clarity, speed, and commercial certainty, while adapting to the evolving requirements of creditors, insolvency professionals, and the broader financial ecosystem. The Bill, which was introduced in the Lok Sabha on August 12, 2025, has now been referred to a select committee of the Parliament for its consideration.
This note decodes the key amendments proposed by the Bill.


dispute resolution clauses

Dispute Resolution Clauses in Commercial Contracts: Lessons from the Supreme Court’s Ruling in South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. SMS Limited

Dispute resolution clauses in commercial contracts shape how parties address conflicts and the forums available for their resolution. In South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. SMS Limited, the Supreme Court has clarified that clauses which merely provide for internal review or administrative decision-making cannot be treated as arbitration agreements under Section 7 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Supreme Court stressed that an arbitration clause must clearly reflect the parties’ intent to arbitrate and align with best practices of modern arbitration. In this note, we examine the Supreme Court’s reasoning, compare the disputed clauses with model clauses of leading arbitral institutions, and highlight the lessons for drafting dispute resolution provisions in commercial contracts.


Alternative Investment Funds

The RBI’s New Directions on Investments by Regulated Entities in Alternative Investment Funds

In the past few years, the Reserve Bank of India (“RBI”) has issued directions to regulate investments by banks, non-banking financial companies and other regulated entities (collectively, “REs”) in alternative investment funds (“AIFs”). These regulatory measures have been primarily intended to curb evergreening of loans by REs, where REs substitute their direct exposure to debtor companies with indirect exposure by investing in AIFs that, in turn, have investments in such debtor companies.
Recently, on July 29, 2025, the RBI introduced the Reserve Bank of India (Investment in AIF) Directions, 2025 (“New Directions”), which increase regulatory oversight over REs’ investments in AIFs while also relaxing some of the prohibitions of the prior regime. The New Directions will supersede the RBI’s prior circulars on this subject, in relation to new investment commitments made by REs in AIFs. This note analyzes the New Directions, the improvements from the prior regulatory framework and the concerns that remain to be addressed.


real estate investment trusts regulations

Recent Regulatory Developments in India (2025)

The Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) has introduced certain amendments to the regulatory framework for real estate investment trusts (REITs) in 2025. These amendments primarily focus on ease of doing business and investor protection. This note provides an overview of the 2025 amendments.


M&A transactions in India

Financing M&A Transactions in India: An Overview

India has witnessed a sustained increase in domestic and cross-border mergers and acquisitions (“M&A”) transactions over the past few years. Despite global M&A activity being subdued this year, M&A deal volumes in India during the first half of 2025 saw an 18% increase in comparison with the first half of 2024. Multiple factors, such as large-scale digitization, favorable investor sentiment and increasing domestic consumption, have contributed to the significant interest of global investors to be a part of India’s growth story.
Acquisition financing, which refers to the process of securing capital to finance the acquisition of equity in another company, is critical to the success of M&A transactions. Such financing could be in the form of debt or equity, raised domestically or from offshore funding sources. In India, debt financing for acquisitions and, in particular, offshore debt, is highly regulated owing to various restrictions imposed by the Reserve Bank of India and Indian exchange control regulations. This note explores the principal funding routes available for financing inbound and domestic M&A in India and the key considerations for market participants when structuring such financing.


infrastructure investment trusts

From Private to Public: SEBI’s New Roadmap for InvIT Conversion

SEBI has proposed reforms to simplify the conversion of private listed InvITs into public ones by removing sponsor lock-ins and minimum contribution requirements, easing post-conversion liquidity norms, and aligning disclosure standards with follow-on offers. The changes aim to reduce compliance, attract investors, and foster InvIT market growth.