State-owned enterprises (“SOEs”) in India have historically stipulated in their commercial contracts that arbitrators must be chosen from a panel pre-determined by the SOEs. These clauses have been challenged as being unfair, but Indian courts have taken differing views in the matter. A five-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India has, however, attempted to put these issues to rest in the case of Central Organisation for Railway Electrification v. ECI SPIC SMO MCML (JV). The Supreme Court has ruled that unilateral appointments of arbitrators, including in the public-private contracts, are invalid. The Supreme Court has further held that while SOEs are not prohibited from curating a panel of arbitrators, an arbitration clause cannot mandate that the other party selects its arbitrator from such curated panel. In this note, we discuss the key findings of the decision and analyze the challenges which may arise.
